Libby Dulski
10/8/16
Reading Response #6
Reading Response #6
Secret Ingredients
I regret to say that the first few
chapters of the Dining Out section in Secret
Ingredients hardly captured my attention. However, the last forty pages
redeemed the reading as the final chapters where entertaining. Between Adam
Gopnik’s chapter “Is There a Crisis in French Cooking?” and Anthony Bourdain’s
chapter “Don’t Eat Before Reading This,” they more than made up with my lack of
interesting from the first few chapters that I read.
I liked Gopnik’s piece because he
talks about why people enjoy Paris. He says that people “love [Paris] because
the first time they came they ate something better than they had ever eaten
before, and kept coming back to eat it again.” I have been to Paris twice. One
of the many things that have been forever cemented in my brain from my two
trips to Paris has got to be the food. I had escargot for the first time I
visited Paris. I was so skeptical, thinking to myself why the hell would I eat snails; they sit on the bottom of the ocean
for goodness’ sake. Regardless to say, I ate the slimy, gooey creatures.
They were in a buttery and creamy pesto-like sauce and still in their shell. It
was the best meal that I had in France. Throughout my visits to France, Paris
specifically, I have ended up eating escargot at least ten times. So, I agree
with Gopnik, I love Paris for the food.
Like in A Cook’s Tour, Bourdain’s signature voice was easily heard in his
chapter “Don’t Eat Before Reading This.” This chapter was almost eye-opening to
readers as Bourdain shows us what really goes on in a kitchen. One part that I
found particularly disturbing but at the same time entertaining was when he
describes what kitchens do with pieces of meat for people who want a well-done
burger. He describes that, “When one of the cooks finds a particularly unlovely
piece of steak- tough, riddled with nerve and connective tissue, off the hip
end of the loin, and maybe a little stinky from age” (85) the chief will have a
couple options as to what to do with the nasty meat. He could throw it in the
trash, or he can serve it. Bourdain describes that kitchens might serve it to
someone who gets their meat cooked well-done: “The way he figures it, the
philistine who orders his food well-done is not likely to notice the difference
between food and flotsam” (85). He also talks about how restaurants reuse
bread. Yet reusing bread was not even the most disgusting part because restaurants
might even recycle butter for hollandaise, which makes me gag thinking about
it. Bourdain’s chapter, has his signature human, self-effacing voice and his
passages about what really happens in kitchens is his way of shortening the
distance between him and the reader. If he is able to critique the food industry
he is a professional in, the reader is more likely to trust him and listen to
him more willingly and take his words with value.
Libby,
ReplyDeleteI also found Bourdain's chapter to be one of the more interesting and engaging pieces in the Dining Out section. It was as insightful as it was practical. I know that I, for one, will no longer be ordering fish when it has potentially been sitting around for days! This was also something that Bourdain referenced in "A Cook's Tour," and as such it was clarifying to have some more background on an author with which I was already familiar.
Libby,
ReplyDeleteBourdain's piece in Secret Ingredients is actually part of his first bestselling book, and I was required to read it for a previous class. The fact that this was my second time reading his description of "save for well done," and when and when not to eat fish, didn't take away from my level of disgust. If you enjoy reading his work, I would highly recommend reading Kitchen Confidential in your spare time. It's even in better than A Cook Abroad in my view.
Libby,
ReplyDeleteI also enjoyed Gopnik's piece, but because I am not familiar with France! I constantly read or hear about how the food is incredible. I find it fascinating that France is so well known for its food. It makes me want to experience a meal in France! I found Anthony Bourdain's piece interesting as well. I have worked in a kitchen before, so his insights don't seem as gross to me. The kitchen is not the most sanitary place, but people still enjoy dining out.
Libby,
ReplyDeleteYes, Bordain's part was very astonishing for me. Actually I have already known there is a dark side of food industry, but even though it was really gross, especially recycling leftover oil into sauces. But,his appealing point is that after reading it, we feel not only gross but also interesting. We all want to know secrets, and he succeeds in satisfying our needs, maybe.
Libby!
ReplyDeleteI so appreciate Bourdain's way of storytelling a lot. His perspective on the dark side of the culinary industry is so interesting! There's a rough texture there. Speaking of criminality in cooking, I read a news story about a cook who was fired for loudly playing NWA's "Fuck The Police" when 2 officers were eating in the restaurant... a more recent example of friction between social identity and professional expectations.
Libby!
ReplyDeleteI so appreciate Bourdain's way of storytelling a lot. His perspective on the dark side of the culinary industry is so interesting! There's a rough texture there. Speaking of criminality in cooking, I read a news story about a cook who was fired for loudly playing NWA's "Fuck The Police" when 2 officers were eating in the restaurant... a more recent example of friction between social identity and professional expectations.
Libby,
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you shared your personal experience with me about the food in France and what you truly thought. My favorite part about reading everyone's pieces is how they tie in their personal lives and experiences to the readings, and how they can connect them to different concepts that I had not even heard about. So, I definitely appreciated this aspect. I'm glad to hear that the food is still a very prominent and important aspect of France to you, as I was almost saddened to read about the changes and "laziness" that was mentioned within the book.